U.S. vs. International Auditing Standards

In: Business and Management

Submitted By cbest4
Words 676
Pages 3
U.S. VS. International Auditing Standards
In the last few years, the world's financial centers have grown increasingly interconnected. This increase in the global business climate can attributed in part to dramatic changes in the business and political climates, increasing global competition, the development of more market-based economies, and rapid technological improvements. With the seemingly unlimited advances in technology, it has become feasible and in most cases very necessary for companies to expand their business operations overseas. This smaller global business environment has led to numerous changes in U.S. Accounting Standards as well as International Accounting Standards. It is needless to say that foreign and domestic auditing standards would have to undergo change as well. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles are broad concepts, evolving from the actual accounting profession. Now, accountants all know that “generally accepted accounting principles” are far from being a clearly defined, comprehensive set of rules which will insure the identical accounting treatment of the same kind of transaction in every case in which it occurs. Auditing in the United States was patterned after early English practices in this countries infancy but was eventually influenced less by the English and more by professional accounting societies. The first national U.S. accounting firms were established by British accountants who brought discipline, professional training, standards, and the idea of a professional organization. In essence the majority of auditing standards date back the standards and practices of early America. With the onset of this increasingly global economy is it no surprise that these standards were inevitably headed for a change. Over the past several years the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other events have dramatically affected the…...

Similar Documents

Generally Accepted Auditing Standards

...Accepted Auditing Standards Joey Wines Franciscan University Generally Accepted Auditing Standards Generally Accepted Auditing Standards, also known as GAAS, is a rather broad topic with many guidelines to follow. An independent auditor plans, conducts, and reports the results of an audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. A short definition of GAAS is the set of systematic guidelines used by auditors when conducting audits on companies' finances, ensuring the accuracy, consistency and verifiability of auditors' actions and reports (Investopedia). There are a total of 10 standards that are broke up into three main sections. These three sections include the general standards, standards of fieldwork and standards of reporting. Each section is littered with requirements that the auditor and the subject company must meet (Investopedia). In short, an auditor must adequately plan the audit in advance, be independent of the client at all times, and always obtain reliable evidence (Investopedia). The companies must present their financial statements in accordance with GAAP, remain consistent in their reporting, and explicitly disclose all pertinent information (Investopedia). Auditing procedures differ from auditing standards. Auditing procedures are acts that the auditor performs during the course of an audit to comply with auditing standards. The first section I will talk about for the Generally Accepted Auditing Standards are the general standards.......

Words: 1470 - Pages: 6

Auditing Standard

...Overview of Auditing Standards Ethical Standards Ethical Standards (FRS, 2010) is issued by Auditing Practices Board. Its responsibilities are set up standards and guidance for auditing work. According to this standard, APB tries to enhance confidence on auditing process for public. ESs includes five requirements that auditors must adhere to and its primary objective is to give ‘true and fair’ opinions on financial statement. The credibility of audit opinions depends on the integrity, objectivity and independence of the auditor. Accordingly, it requires the quality of audit more stringent, especially the independence of auditors’ assurance. ES2 illustrates the guidance on some particular circumstances, which may generate threats to the independence and objectivity of auditors. ES3 states that senior positions have collaborated with audit engagement for a continuous period should be rotating. ES4 explains that there is no relationship between audit opinion and audit fees or other remuneration. ES5 shows that audit firm should consider whether non-audit service have significant effect on the threats to the auditor’s objectivity or independence. International Standards on Auditing ISA (FRS, 2009) copes with independent auditor’s overall responsibilities when implementing auditing process. These professional standards establish objectives of independent auditors together with explain the scope and nature of auditing process, which is designed to enable auditors to......

Words: 1844 - Pages: 8

Auditing Standards

...system is cost effective if the interest costs saved due to obtaining more timely deposits is sufficient to cover the net increase in costs of cash receipts processing. g) Concentration banking- another way to speed up collection of payments on accounts is concentration banking. Customers in an area make payments to a local branch office rather than firm headquarters. Local branches make deosits in an account in a local bank. Surplus funds are periodically transferred to the firms primary bank. Transferrign funds between account can be costly, wire transfers cost a fee. A slower and less expensive way is using bank checks h) EFT i) International cash management- can use various systems, including electronic systems, to manage the cash accounts they hold in various countries. Carefully manageing international accounts may provide management with opportunities to increase earnings. 3) Marketable securities management- such assets can generally be converted to cash very quickly and marketable securities have an advantage over cash in that they provide an investment return. Factors that are considered in making the choice: xvii) Minimum investment required: some investments, such as high yield certificates of deposit, require larger investments xviii) Safety- risk to principal xix) Marketability- relates to the speed with which the investment can be liquidated xx) Maturity- the lenth of time the funds are......

Words: 7302 - Pages: 30

Generally Accepted Auditing Standards

...Generally Accepted Auditing Standards Auditing is a vital role within for-profit organizations, non-profit organizations, government, and the economy. With many standards, rules, procedures, and regulations placed on auditing financial reports for organizations, one would obtain an understanding as to the Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS). These GAAS were collaborated by members of the American Institue of Certified Public Accounting (AICPA) in the 1940's. In the 1940's, three guidelines to include General Standards, Standards of field work, and Standards of reporting. Each of these topics includes details as to the "flow" of the auditing process. After the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (SOX), the regulations were increased with detail, and offered more insight as to the consequences of not following the "rules". The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, (PCAOB), obtained more duties to assist in reviewing material relevant to auditing and auditors. One of the points one may find interesting is the importance of the regulations lack of required documentation. Rather than placing detailed requirements on included reports it lays a framework of guidelines of which to include, and what material needs to be disclosed. The main purpose for the regulations is to promote full disclosure and transparency, a common element which was missing prior. Commonly, many find the regulations to apply to for-profit and publicly traded organizations, however; many are......

Words: 737 - Pages: 3

Auditing Standard Essay

...Auditing Standards Essay: Auditing Planning Broadly speaking, audit planning is specific guidelines for auditor to perform an audit. Audit planning is usually conducted at the beginning stage of audit process. AICPA (American Institute of Certificate Public Accounting), PCAOB (Public Company Oversight Board), and IFAC (The International Federation of Accountants) are organizations or non-profit corporations who contributes to developing standards and guidance in auditing area, including standards for audit planning. Thus, this essay will discuss the requirement, and compare and contrast, of standards and guidance for auditing planning that has been issued by them; as well, analyze the impact on the performance of the audit. AICPA, by its publication titled AUC Section 300, addresses guidance for auditors in planning an audit. This contains introduction, objective, requirements, and application and other explanatory material. First, the introduction part includes the scope in planning the audit, the role and timing of planning, and the effective date of this standard. The scope of planning an audit explains the responsibility of the auditor to plan an audit of financial statement. This section also mentioned to refer to section 600, Special Considerations – Audits of Group Financial Statements (Including the Work of Component Auditors) for further information related to the auditor’s responsibility. The role of planning and timing explains the adequate benefit in......

Words: 2209 - Pages: 9

Standard Accountin Auditing

...REGISTERED STUDENTS MICPA EXAMINATION ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING STANDARDS The Institute’s Examination Regulations and Syllabus state that: (a) Questions involving knowledge of accounting and auditing should be answered in accordance with the requirements of approved accounting standards, approved auditing standards/guidelines and the relevant legislation; Questions involving knowledge of new approved accounting standards, approved auditing standards/guidelines and exposure drafts will not be set until at least 6 months have elapsed since the last day of the month in which the statement became effective or was published. (b) The list of accounting standards, auditing standards and other technical pronouncements, which are currently examinable in the Institute’s examination, are set out below. I. Approved Accounting Standards The Companies Act 1965 requires that approved accounting standards are to be applied to the financial statements of all companies. Approved accounting standards are issued by the Malaysian Accounting Standards Board (MASB), which is established under the Financial Reporting Act 1997. For the purposes of the MICPA pronouncements are examinable : examination, the following accounting (i) (ii) (iii) MASB approved accounting standards and other pronouncements issued by MASB; Malaysian Accounting Standards (MAS) issued by MICPA, which have not been replaced by MASB approved accounting standards; Technical Bulletins (TB) issued by MICPA, which are......

Words: 1953 - Pages: 8

Generally Accepted Auditing Standards

...Generally Accepted Auditing Standards Paper ACC/491 Contemporary Auditing Santos Alarcon January 11, 2015 Describe the elements of GAAS? Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS) are “sets of standards against which the quality of audits are performed and may be judged” (Generally Accepted Auditing Standards, 2014). According to AU Section 150, there are three general standards, three fieldwork standards, and four reporting standards. In the United States, these standards are developed by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board since the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002. The three general standards require the auditor to remain mentally independent in all matters related to the audit, to have technical training that is adequate and proficient to perform the audit, and to exercise professional care while performing the audit, and also while preparing the report. The three fieldwork standards require the auditor to properly plan the work and to supervise assistants, to sufficiently understand the company and its environment, and to obtain enough audit evidence to support a reasonable basis for an opinion regarding the financial statements under audit. The four standards of reporting require the auditor to state in his/her report whether the financial statements are presented in accordance with GAAP, they have to identify when GAAP principles have not been consistently observed, they have to include in the......

Words: 929 - Pages: 4

Education: the U.S vs Finland

...Angelia Owens HDFS 201 Cultural Paper 6/2/14 Education The United States Vs. Finland The following paper is a cultural comparison of the United States and Finland educational systems and their outcomes. Almost every American will agree that the U.S is in dire need of change within its education system. I have chosen to compare our system with Finland’s because they are at the top of the list when rated by Program for International Student Assessment, or PISA (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD], 2008). The PISA evaluates students from different countries to measure the knowledge of students who are closer to finishing high school. There are a few major differences in each system which sets one apart from the other. First is how each system is funded. Second is standardized testing in the U.S verses personal assessments in Finland. Lastly, the general outlines of the systems themselves. To begin, the U.S. educational system is governed by individual states. However, there are multiple options for attaining an education in the U.S. Some of these options are: public schools, private schools, charter schools and home schools. States typically put regulations on curriculum for public schools and receive funding from U.S. Department of Education and state taxes (U.S. Department of Education, 2008). Private schools determine their own sets of regulations, policies and curriculum and these rules are created by the board of......

Words: 840 - Pages: 4

Effects of Auditing Standard

...Effects of Auditing Standards Business auditors are a valuable and much needed method of making sure that business and corporations operate within the law. Auditing businesses is the best method to determine if a business is keeping their methods legitimate and that they are not doing anything illegal such as falsifying profit reports. Standards for all manner of businesses from the small store to the international multi-million dollar industry are getting higher and frankly, this is a change that, in light of catastrophes like the collapse of WorldCom, was a long time coming. Introducing the reality of auditing standards mostly, auditors only bother paying attention to transactions that appear to be out of the norm (Glater, 2002). The tedious run of the mill activities of a business do not really get that much attention. However, if something seems off or out of the ordinary, an auditor should take a closer look. If an irregularity or discrepancy is found, then the auditor should make a judgment on whether or not to investigate further (Glater, 2002). Investigating smaller transactions can be costly and time consuming but there are certain guidelines an auditor should use to help make that determination. For example, one criterion would be if the business had an incentive for falsifying profits to the public, due to falling stock prices and other similar situations. Auditors are now utilizing computer software when it comes to some of their investigations. Access to......

Words: 717 - Pages: 3

Generally Accepted Auditing Standards

...Generally Accepted Auditing Standards Paper Gary Varnell University of Phoenix ACC 490 Auditing Aaron Strenkoski July 11, 2011 Introduction This paper is designed to explain the nature and functions of auditing, relate these functions to the audit functions of the Shawnee News-Star, describe the elements that make up the Generally Accepted Auditing Standards and how these standards apply to financial, operational, and compliance audits. This paper will also explain the effect that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as well as the Public Company Auditing Oversight Board (PCAOB) will have on the audits of companies that are publicly traded, and will also discuss the additional requirements that are placed on auditors as a result of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act as well as the actions of the PCAOB. Auditing is defined as “ a systematic process of objectively obtaining and evaluating evidence regarding assertions about economic actions and events to ascertain the degree of correspondence between those assertions and established criteria and communicating the results to interested users” (Boynton & Johnson 2006, p. 6). The auditing process begins with the auditor obtaining information of an entity and evaluating, in an unbiased manner, this information as it relates to the processes, economic transactions and procedures of the entity. When evaluating this information, the auditor must ensure that the information complies with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and any...

Words: 1122 - Pages: 5

Auditing Standards

...Auditing Standards Accounting 491 November 16, 2015 Dwayne Thompson Auditing Standards The art of auditing has evolved over several decades. The use of technology has changed the procedure significantly. Along with the evolution of standards and procedure are necessary to ensure economic growth and financial stability. Before 2002, it seems as though auditing took a reactive approach to questionable circumstances and dealings. Today the powers in control are producing a proactive approach. That is to say, standards and regulations are set in place to ensure users of financial data are getting timely and accurate reports. Elements of Generally Accepted Auditing Standards Information and history regarding Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS) are set in place for auditing private companies. Like other auditing procedures, these same rules are used for publicly traded companies (Loughran, 2015). Before the process of audit begins, there are certain particulars that are examined to ensure creditability of the reports' outcome. Audits are relied upon heavily to encourage an upward moving economy. The elements involved are, general standards, standards of fieldwork and standards of reporting. General standards refer to the competency of the auditor, his or her independence and the due professional care that is rendered. Standards of fieldwork encompass how the auditor performs his or her work. This guidance entails the gathering and organization of data that will......

Words: 1005 - Pages: 5

History of Auditing Standards

...Auditing standards history in the United States Auditing profession has relied on agreed upon procedures at the beginning of its emergence. The current formal audit practice has evolved relatively recently. The story of how auditing evolved started in the early 20th century with the growth of industrial revolution, when firms entered the stock market which was unregulated at the time a growing need evolved to detect fraud and make more reliable financial statements as investors began to depend on financial reports. Federal Trade Commission requested AICPA to provide guidance to accountants and auditors in 1917 as a response AICPA issued a series of recommendation to the accounting community on financial reporting and auditing. In 1929 the AICPA issued a specific guide for auditing (Verification of Financial Statements) and it stated that the extent of the work is a responsibility of the auditor which is one of the most important auditing concepts even now. In 1936 AICPA issued Examination of Financial Statements by Independent Public Accountants, a guide on performing audit procedures on small and mid-sized companies. The SEC which was created in 1934. A part of its duties was to oversight the auditing profession, and it required the companies to send periodic reports in accordance with GAAP and to provide assurances with their reports. Auditing standards issuance used to be triggered by financial fraud events or crimes. Statement on Auditing Procedure (SAP) No. 1 in......

Words: 680 - Pages: 3

Auditing Standard

...500 380 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON AUDITING 500 AUDIT EVIDENCE (Effective for audits of financial statements for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2009) CONTENTS Paragraph Introduction Scope of this ISA ........................................................................................ 1−2 Effective Date ............................................................................................. 3 Objective .................................................................................................... 4 Definitions .................................................................................................. 5 Requirements Sufficient Appropriate Audit Evidence ....................................................... 6 Information to Be Used as Audit Evidence ................................................. 7−9 Selecting Items for Testing to Obtain Audit Evidence ................................ 10 Inconsistency in, or Doubts over Reliability of, Audit Evidence ................ 11 Application and Other Explanatory Material Sufficient Appropriate Audit Evidence ....................................................... A1−A25 Information to Be Used as Audit Evidence ................................................. A26−A51 Selecting Items for Testing to Obtain Audit Evidence ................................ A52−A56 Inconsistency in, or Doubts over Reliability of, Audit Evidence ................ A57 International Standard on Auditing......

Words: 6043 - Pages: 25

International Accounting Standards

...------------------------------------------------- International Accounting Standards * Print   * PDF   * Cite   *           Comparable, transparent, and reliable financial information is fundamental for the smooth functioning of capital markets. In the global arena, the need for comparable standards of financial reporting has become paramount because of the dramatic growth in the number, reach, and size of multinational corporations, foreign direct investments, cross-border purchases and sales of securities, as well as the number of foreign securities listings on the stock exchanges. However, because of the social, economic, legal, and cultural differences among countries, the accounting standards and practices in different countries vary widely. The credibility of financial reports becomes questionable if similar transactions are accounted for differently in different countries. To improve the comparability of financial statements, harmonization of accounting standards is advocated. Harmonization strives to increase comparability between accounting principles by setting limits on the alternatives allowed for similar transactions. Harmonization differs from standardization in that the latter allows no room for alternatives even in cases where economic realities differ. The international accounting standards resulting from harmonization efforts create important benefits. Investors and analysts benefit from enhanced comparability of financial statements.......

Words: 1748 - Pages: 7

Generally Accepted Auditing Standards

...Generally Accepted Auditing Standards ACC/490 June 25, 2012 Generally Accepted Auditing Standards The auditing and accounting profession has various standards and regulations that must be followed. The standards and regulations were put into place to ensure that reports are unbiased and accurate. The Generally Accepted Auditing Standards create stipulations on the accuracy, consistency, and verifiability of the information. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board has standards in place to regulate financial reporting and ensure accuracy. The Generally Accepted Auditing Standards is “a set of systematic guidelines used by auditors when conducting audits on companies’ finances, ensuring the accuracy, consistency and verifiability of auditors’ actions and reports” (Investopedia, 2012. p. 1). Following the guidlelines set forth by the Generally Accepted Auditing Standards allows auditors to reduce the chance of overlooking information. The Generally Accepted Auditing Standards are divided into three sections: general standards, standards of fieldwork, and standards of reporting. Each of these three sections has specific standards an auditor must follow for each step in the auditing process. The general standards address the auditor’s qualifications and the standards that are required. The general standards require that the audit must be performed by a qualified individual who has received the proper training. The......

Words: 832 - Pages: 4