'Modern Liberals Have Abandoned Individualism and Embraced Collectivism.' Discuss

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By karald
Words 870
Pages 4
'Modern liberals have abandoned individualism and embraced collectivism.' Discuss

the question asks to Analyze how liberalism stemmed into abandoning the two core values of individualism and collectivism. In the essay that follows it will be assessed how modern liberals evolved from their classical core beliefs.

Individualism, this is the most fundamental feature of liberalism. It is the unique feature that distinguishes it from the other ideologies. Classical liberals interpret it as an individual his or her own self-awareness, personality, capabilities and free will to decide their own fate.
On the other hand, Modern liberals accept the idea of individuality but made certain observations, such as; we cannot consider ourselves completely free to peruse our own interests because we also have social obligations to consider the needs and welfare of others.

It can be already be seen how the attitude of the liberals change towards the individual, as at first they view each citizen as a single special individual, however now, they have a broader view of the society as they have to care for each other and not only themselves. Thomas H Green was one of the first philosophers to have a new perspective of the idea of liberalism, thus creating the foundation of modern liberalism. He believes that individuals have sympathy for one another which link to the idea of caring for one another and not only for themselves. This already highlights the fact that liberal ideology is leaning towards viewing society as a group rather than an individual. This links to the idea of collectivism, which states that the emphasis is put on a certain group rather than any specific one person. The argument can be supported with several distinct features of modern liberalism that emphasize collectivism.…...

Similar Documents

Similarities Between Classical and Modern Liberals Are Greater Than the Differences. Discuss

...Similarities between classical and modern liberalism are greater than the differences. Discuss. (45 marks) Typically, liberalism is categorised into two separate components; classical liberalism, which was fashioned during the 19th century as a result of the industrial revolution, and the more recent Modern Liberalism which emerged as industrialisation continued within the UK. Although both divisions of Liberalism unavoidably overlap in attitudes and approaches regarding the theory behind the ideology, I believe, fundamentally, that clear tensions between these aspects of Liberalism are more evident when analysing this ideology. Some will say that both classical and modern liberalists possess a number of parallel approaches towards this political theory and its key concepts. Firstly, both strands of Liberalism believe in the necessity of some kind of a state, since life without a state, as Thomas Hobbes stated, would be ‘solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short’. Both views consider the existence of a state to be essential in order to protect individual rights. Since liberals generally considered humanity to be self-interested and egoistical, a state was needed to ensure that individuals did not exploit other individuals’ rights, through acts of stealing, harming, or even slavery, and was therefore the only thing that was capable of restraining all individuals and groups within society. Hobbes and Locke particularly stressed the importance of creating a ‘social contract’...

Words: 1729 - Pages: 7

“Modern Western Landscape Painting Is Directly Related to Modern Individualism”

...“Modern western landscape painting is directly related to modern individualism” “Modern western landscape painting” is fascinating and often very lifelike. The viewer of “modern western landscape paintings” often has the opportunity to interpret the painting individually. There are no requirements how to do it. It is exactly the same with the “modern individualism”. Each person is different than the other. Thus I totally agree with the main statement. I think there is a relation between “modern western landscaping” and “modern individualism”. This can be explained based on the paintings “The Wanderer Above The Sea Of Fog” from Caspar David Friedrich and “Yosemite Valley At Sunset” from Albert Bierstadt. Both paintings are completely different, but they both give the viewer a lot of room for interpreting. Thus, the viewer is left to decide how he interpreted the picture and what he focuses. Caspar David Friedrich actually focuses something on his painting, but the meaning of it is not clearly. In general you can see man on a mountain. He is pointing with back to the viewer. He seems to be in a mountain range. Everywhere you can see mountains. There is a kind of valley but you cannot really see it because above the valley is a “sea of fog”. The fog is very conspicuous. Because of the dark colors in the front of the painting, it makes a gloomy impression. The view of the landscape is scary as well. All these high mountains and the fog reminds of scene from a horror movie. But...

Words: 667 - Pages: 3

Have Conservatives Abandoned Thatcherism

...To What Extent has the Conservative Party Abandoned Thatcherism? Throughout Margaret Thatchers time as Prime Minister (1979-1990), a very aggressive way of governing the country. This style of leadership and the policies associated with it are known as Thatcherism. The main aim of Thatcherism was to create a 'small government' that is one in which the tole of the state is significantly reduced in matters such as public services and the economy, Thatcher desired a free market and a privatised economy. Thatcher was also a firm believer in independence and individualism, this lead to a desire for self-reliant people who provide for their family and are responsible for their own well being. Since this time Conservatism has changed, especially since the appointment of David Cameron MP as their leader and eventually Prime minister. The party has moved away from right wing and is instead now more centred on more liberal policies, This is down to the desire of Cameron for moderation. In this constantly changing society this modernisation is essential for any party that wishes to stay in power. Many policies remain intact from the Thatcher years such as the economy, but many have also changed like foreign policy and socially. Thatcherism demanded a market that was a a free and flexible as possible, a deregulated economy. In 1979 Thatcher shifted the country towards a speculative market economy rather than a manufacturing based economy. An economy in which utilities and......

Words: 331 - Pages: 2

Individualism

...Individualism The Opposite of Collectivism Individualists societies are those in which the interest of the individual prevails over the interest of the group, and in which people are accepted to look after themselves and their imigiate families. Or The habit or principle of being independent & self reliant . “A culture that celebrates individualism & Wealth” Or A Social theory favoring freedom of Action for Individual over collective or state control. :Encouragement has been given to individualism, Free Enterprise, an the pursuit of Profit. Or Synonyms of Individuals are Independence, Self Direction, Self Reliance, free thinking, Free though, Orginallity. Individualism Individual is the moral stance, Political Philosophy, Ideaology, or Social outlook that enfaces the moral worth of the individual. Individualist promote the exercises of one’s m goal’s & desire and so value Independence & Self reliance & evocate that interest of the individual should achieve precedence over the state or a social group, while opposing external interference upon once on interest by society or institutions such as the government. Individualism makes the Individual its focus and so starts “with the fundamental premise that the human individual is of primary importance in the struggle for liberation” Liberalism extentionalism and anarchism are examples of movements that take the human individual as a central unit of......

Words: 1503 - Pages: 7

Charities Are Outmoded Institutions That Have No Contribution to Make to Modern Society. What Is Needed Are Social Enterprises. Discuss.

...Charities are outmoded institutions that have no contribution to make to modern society. What is needed are social enterprises. Discuss. Introduction In this essay I will start by looking at definitions of both “Charities” and “Social Enterprises” before going on to look at a short history of the development of the voluntary sector in the UK. I will then move on to examine the arguments suggesting that charities have become outmoded and the perceived benefits of social enterprises as an alternative approach. In the final section I attempt to critically assess these arguments and to draw some conclusions. Some definitions Charities are essentially organisations established to provide some form of public good, with most of their funding being generated through donations from individuals, companies or government departments. In the UK a charity must be registered with the Charity Commission and the purposes of the charity must meet the “public benefit requirement”. Its purposes will be defined in its governing document or constitution, and ALL of its purposes must be exclusively charitable. This is the main distinction between charities and social enterprises. This latter term is used to describe a wide range of organisations which are run as businesses (and often constituted as companies rather than charities) but don’t exist purely to make money for their stakeholders. Instead they have other goals such as to benefit the community, the environment or any other social......

Words: 3419 - Pages: 14

On What Grounds Have Liberals Defended Democracy?

...Liberals, no matter classical or modern, believe in small state. As Thomas Paine put it: "Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil". This concept links nicely with the idea of democracy, which literally means "rule by people". Liberals have defended democracy on the grounds that people must have a way of protecting themselves against the government and its actions. This type of democracy is also referred to as protective democracy. Moreover, democracy opens an ability for people to choose. In a pure democracy, for instance, people would vote on every occasion and policy, hence the core liberal idea of individualism would flourish in its fullest. However, in modern society it is practically impossible to have pure democracy, so we have to resort to participatory democracy. This still support the idea of individualism, as each vote counts towards the end result. Moreover, democracy improves political participation as people know that their voices will be heard. It also encourages political education in order to make the best choice of the candidate, which links with the idea of reason and the core period in liberalism's history of enlightenment. By being rational and self-seeking, individuals will want the best for themselves, hence they will seek to vote for the candidate that suits their needs and beliefs best, In order to do so, they will have to read, debate or learn about them by other means, which will increase the overall intelligence of individuals......

Words: 375 - Pages: 2

To What Extent Have Modern Liberals Departed from the Ideas of Classical Liberalism? (45 Marks)

...Although it can be said that classical and modern liberals hold the same fundamental principles and ideas, it could also definitely be argued that modern liberalism moves away from the brutality of classical liberalism, and the two concepts have departed, with modern liberals focusing more on helping individuals achieve their potential and protecting them. With this said, both concepts do undoubtedly hold true the fundamental concept which is freedom of the individual; even if they interpret this concept in different ways. Whilst the moving away from classical liberalism holds to be true, because of concept such as neoliberalism, classical liberalism does still have an influence on every day life. One of the fundamental liberal principles is centered around freedom of the individual, and this can be said to be both one of the main similarities, and one of the main differences between modern and classical liberalism. Classical liberals believe in negative freedom; freedom being the absence of external constraints. The individual is therefore free: left alone and not interfered with or coerced by others. Classical liberals believe this leads to the formation of a meritocracy; where people can make a success of themselves based on their hard work and talents, and are not held back by the state when trying to do so. Modern liberals share this same concept of freedom and believe that the individual should be free to make the best of themselves through talent and hard work.......

Words: 1388 - Pages: 6

To What Extent Have Modern Liberals Departed from the Ideas of Classical Liberalism? (45)

...To What Extent Have Modern Liberals Departed from the Ideas of Classical Liberalism? (45) Liberalism has been active throughout Europe since the early 19th century, although the UKs first experience of Liberalism put into practice was in 1868 under Gladstone’s Liberal government. Early Liberalist ideas concentrated largely around core values of freedom, individualism and a minimal state. However, revisionists have deployed a modern liberalism, which in many ways have departed from core themes of Classic Liberals. Classic Liberalism has a heavy focus surrounding the core value of freedom, which also overlap the core theme of a minimalistic state. However, the evolution of liberalism, has brought about a different perspective as to what extent freedom should be exercised and at what point the state have a responsibility to implement restrictions. Early liberals such as John Locke and Adam Smith supported a ‘negative freedom’ whereby individuals were left to make their own choices without interferences from the state. J.S Mill another classic liberal proposed a very simple principle known as the Harm Principle. The harm principle is a concept which acknowledges the need for government intervention only when one’s action is physically detrimental to another. This again defends the concepts of both ‘negative freedom’ and a minimalistic state. Locke proposed the idea of ‘Natural Rights’ which specified god given rights such as life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The idea......

Words: 919 - Pages: 4

Have Modern Liberals Abandoned Individualism and Embraced Collectivism?

...I) -individualism is the belief in the supreme importance of the individual over any social group or collective body. For classic liberals, this is heavily associated with attempts to contract or minimise the state with a view to widen individual freedom and strengthen individual responsibility. -modern liberalism, aka '20th c lib' is a branch of liberal theory that emerged as a response to the spread of poverty ignorance and disease in the post-industrial era, stressing the importance of egoistical individualism, negative freedom, enabling state and economic management. -due to such developments, classic liberals have accused modern liberals of abandoning individualism and embracing collectivism, which is the belief that collective human endeavour is of greater moral & practical value to individual self striving and that human beings have a social core. Collectivism is commonly associated with pushing the state forward, as the state is a mechanism through which collective energies are harnessed and collective ends achieved. A) -Modern liberalism have been accused of embracing collectivism because of the extent to which which they are prepared to support government intervention in social/economic affairs via an 'enabling/interventionist state'. Classic liberals understand freedom in negative terms, believing the absence of external legal/physical constraints as a condition for autonomy, but recognise that some authority is needed via a neutral arbiter amongst egoistical......

Words: 960 - Pages: 4

On What Grounds Have Liberals Supported Democracy?

...Liberals have justified democracy as they believe they must have a means of protecting themselves from the intervention of government. This is sometimes seen as protective democracy, and it, for example, allows tax-payers to protect their property by controlling the composition of the tax-making body – hence the principle of ‘no taxation without representation’. Utilitarians have also linked democracy to the ability of individuals to advance or defend their interests, meaning that political democracy promotes ‘the greatest happiness for the greatest number’. Democracy has also been endorsed on the grounds that political participation has educational advantages. By participating in political life, citizens enhance their understanding, strengthen their sensibilities and achieve a higher level of personal development. This is sometimes called developmental democracy. Mill believed in individuality and fulfilling potential. A more modern liberal defence of democracy draws on pluralist ideas in arguing that democracy is the best means of maintaining equilibrium within complex and fluid modern societies. As democracy gives competing groups a political voice, it binds them to the political system and so maintains political stability. Democracy is rule by the people. Its ‘liberal’ features are reflected in a network of internal and external checks on government in order to protect citizens against the state and guarantee liberty. Therefore, democracy in most of the western......

Words: 460 - Pages: 2

To What Extent Have Modern Liberals Departed from the Ideas of Classical Liberalism?

...To what extent have modern liberals departed from the ideas of classical liberalism? (45 marks) The two branches of modern liberalism and classical liberalism naturally clash within the ideology of liberalism itself. There are fundamental ideas that form criteria for debate across the two coexisting views, although they do possess various similarities with one another. Classical liberals often highlight the supreme importance of the individual, reflected in their desire to minimise the role of the state, whereas modern liberals take a more collective approach, and the see the expansion of the state as necessary based on the socio-economic circumstances of society. In this sense, modern liberalism can be viewed as a development on classical liberal thinking; it is only in the new ideas that modern liberalism brought about upon which they are fundamentally different. Modern liberalism can be viewed as taking a strong departure from classical liberalism based on their ideas of freedom. Firstly, classical liberals have believed in the idea of negative freedom, meaning non-interference or freedom from external interference of any sort; individuals should be left alone to make their own decisions. The government or state, external to the individual, should act as a ‘night watchman’, as summarized by the classical liberal John Locke, meaning its primary role should merely be to oversee society to keep law and order in place and the state in check. An extension of this classical......

Words: 1607 - Pages: 7

To What Extent Do Classical and Modern Liberals Follow the Same Principles in Their Ideology?

...To what extent do Classical and Modern Liberals follow the same principles in their ideology? (45) Typically, liberalism is categorised into two separate components; Classical liberalism, which was fashioned during the 19th century and the more recent modern liberalism that emerged following the rise in industrialisation. Although both divisions of Liberalism unavoidably overlap in attitudes and principles regarding the theory behind the ideology, there are a number of notable differences when the two forms of ideology are analysed together. Some will say that both Classical and modern liberalists possess a number of parallel approaches towards this political theory and its key concepts. Therefore, it shall be my conclusion that, whilst both Classical and Modern Liberals follow the same ideology, they interpret it in a different way. Firstly, both strands of Liberalism believe in the necessity of some kind of a state, since life without a state, as Thomas Hobbes stated, would be ‘solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short’. Both views consider the existence of a state to be essential in order to protect individual rights. Since Liberalism, from a general perspective, considers humanity to be self-interested and egoistical. The importance of the state is emphasised since it ensures that individuals do not exploit other individuals rights (through acts of theft, harm etc.). Liberal analysists, Hobbes and Locke, particularly stressed the importance of creating a ‘social......

Words: 922 - Pages: 4

To What Extent Has Modern Liberalism Departed from Classical Liberalism 40

...There are huge differences between classical and modern liberalism and as a result classical liberals believe that modern liberals have not stayed true to initial ideas posed by the likes of John Locke given that modern liberals have embraced collectivism while classical liberals favoured pure individualism. But they are fundamentally both forms of liberalism so are united in their belief of freedom and rights of the individual but they have slightly different views on the type of freedom they support. Classical liberalism has a belief in utilitarianism first posed by Jeremy Bentham, this is where individuals make tiny calculations about whether their actions will ‘maximise pleasure or minimise pain’. This is an egotistical form of individualism that assumes individuals are motivated by self-interest. Modern liberals do not share this view as they see it as a flawed method. This view of classical liberalism was opposite to that of paternalistic conservatism, who believe that the state can make the best decisions for the individual whereas classical liberals such as Bentham believed individuals knew what was best for themselves and thus can have the responsibility and freedom to act as they choose. This means that because the likes of Locke and Bentham prioritised the freedom and happiness of the individual, this leads classical liberals to a belief in negative freedom, which argues that there should be a removal of external restrictions from the individual. This is......

Words: 933 - Pages: 4

To What Extend Do Liberals Support the Principle of Equality. Discuss.

...To what extend do liberals support the principle of equality. Discuss. First and foremost, the liberal principle of equality is that human beings are of an ‘identical worth’. Every individual is entitled to be treated in the same way. The Classical Liberals of the 19th century proposed a society in which individuals were largely free from restraint. Therefore, in a free society people are ‘free to be unequal’ and the consequence of such society would be that some would succeed while some fail. The game of life must thus be played on an even playing field. Liberals theory of justice is based on a belief in equality. Individualism, which is the central value for all liberals, implied a commitment to Foundation Equality. This is where each human being are seen to be ‘born’ equal in the sense that each individual is of equal moral worth, an idea embodied in the notion of natural rights or human rights. Foundation equality implies a belief in Formal Equality, an idea that individuals should enjoy the same FORMAL STATUS in society. The significance of the principle of equality in liberal values is highlighted in their disapproval of any social privileges or advantages that are enjoyed by some but denied to on others on the basis of factors such as gender, race, colour, screed, religion or social background. In this sense, liberalism is difference blind which is a concept based on the belief that everyone is treated the same regardless of any feature specific to him or her...

Words: 673 - Pages: 3

To What Extent Have Liberals Agreed over Freedom?

...To what extent have liberals agreed over freedom? Liberals believe that human beings are first and foremost, individuals, endowed with reason. This implies that each individual should enjoy the maximum possible freedom consistent with a like freedom for all. Belief in the supreme importance of the individual leads naturally to a commitment to individual freedom. Isaiah Berlin distinguished between a `negative' theory of liberty and a `positive' one. Early liberals have believed in Negative Freedom. It is the absence of external restrictions and constraints upon the individual, usually understood as non-interference. It is often associated with freedom of choice and importance of privacy. However, classical liberals feared that `free' individuals may exploit others for their own interest and advantage hence why law and government are necessary. Negative freedom is therefore upheld primarily through checks and balances proposed by Montesquieu on government power through codified constitutions and bills of rights. Examples of negative freedom include civil liberties, such as freedom of conscience, freedom of speech, freedom of movement and freedom of religious worship. Modern liberals, on the other hand, believed that the unrestrained freedom promoted by classical liberalism has brought about new forms of poverty and injustice. T.H. Green challenged the classical liberal notion of liberty. Negative freedom merely removes external constraints on the individual, giving......

Words: 360 - Pages: 2