Charles Schwab & Co Case Study

In: Business and Management

Submitted By irisshen
Words 338
Pages 2
Charles Schwab & Co: What were the key factors underlying Schwab's competitive advantage until the mid-1990s? How have these factors reinforced each other?
Competitive Advantage 1. Different Customer Group. In 1975, brokerage commissions were deregulated. Schwab took the advantage of the new opportunities and focused on providing informed investors with low-cost access to security transactions. This was a new approach compared to full-service brokerage firms. 2. Technology. Schwab invested heavily in technology as a way to lower costs. In 1985, Schwab was one of the first firms to use personal computer as a distribution channel for financial services. In the late 1980s and on into the early 1990s, Schwab developed several technology-based services. a) TeleBroker, a fully automated telephone system (in English, Spanish, Mandarin, and Cantonese) that allowed customers to retrieve real-time stock quotes and place orders. b) SchwabLink, a service for fee-based financial advisors with back-office custodial services. Also, the relationship with independent, fee-based advisors allowed Schwab to reach more customers, to sell more products. c) OneSource, the Schwab Mutual Fund program, a revolutionary fund supermarket that helped customers purchase Schwab and non-Schwab no-load mutual funds with greater ease and without paying transaction fees. It was also an exceptional distribution channel for the fund providers, especially the smaller ones who lacked substantial advertising budgets. Schwab's advisor partners had a broader selection of funds from which to choose.
Due to all this technology services, Schwab attracted more customers, advisors and providers, therefore expanded its revenue base. 3. Better Spreads. Schwab’s purchase was a forward-integrating move that allowed the firm to procure better spreads than many of its…...

Similar Documents

Charles Schwab Case Study

...Integrated Marketing Communication | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc : The « Talk to Chuck » Advertising Campaign | Group 5:Alka MishraElisabeth LespinetMegannePriyanka NarayananNaman Bhayana | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc : The «  Talk to Chuck » Advertising Campaign Charles Schwab & Co is a financial company which offers brokerage products and services. In this case, we will see the new “Talk to Chuck” corporate advertising campaign launched by CEOCharles Schwab (also called Chuck) and Beck Saeger in January 2006. This campaign included a colorful series of television ads that used animated images of customers talking, about their investment needs. The goal was to improve market share. About the industry the financial services industry comprised three major sectors: banking, securities and commodities and insurance. Retail brokerage firms act as intermediaries between buyers and sellers, offer little assistance beyond executing a customer’s transaction and provide investment advice on which stocks to buy and sell and when. The main retail brokerage firm in the USA are Ameritrade, Schwab, E*Trade, Fidelity Investments and Merrill Lynch. Traditionally, investors turned to their brokers for research and advice to guide their investing decisions. But nowadays, technology allowed investors to sell or buy securities online. The stock market decline following the collapse of the Internet Bubble in 2001-2002 motived individual investors to become more investment...

Words: 1156 - Pages: 5

Case Study: Eagle Mfg. Co.

...reasons other department are not cooperating with Ted Jones Group? The reason other departments other department are not cooperating with Ted Jones Group. After going through the case, I find the below reasons for why Ted is not getting support and cooperation from other departments. These are as below... 1. Lack of Training: This is the most important reason I find for non-cooperation of the other departments to the Ted department. Ted's staff has not received any training on their working style, attitude, quality measurements etc. A proper training to his department could have eliminated various issues. They should have got training on how to improve attitude, team spirit, quality, performance, services by applying some quality tools like six sigma and Dmaic etc. Lack of proper training is affecting the effectiveness and efficiency of Ted's supply department. 2. Lack of process: There are no defined processes to do a task. Defined processes will help Ted to improve the quality of services and the people. For example whenever a new employee joins Ted's team he can go through these defined processes to understand the working, models and steps to do a particular task effectively and in an error free manner. 3. Lack of Transparent Communication: The other important reason I analyze from the case is lack of transparent communication between the Ted's supply department and other functional units of the organization. There is lack of interdepartmental and......

Words: 561 - Pages: 3

Co-Op Case Study

...the “Excel Co-Op: Responding to Biofuels” case carefully and answer the following questions.  This assignment is an INDIVIDUAL assignment. You may not work in teams or discuss your answers – doing so will be considered cheating.  Please limit your answers to THREE, SINGLE-SPACED PAGES with 1-inch margins, an 11 or 12-point font, and a cover sheet on top. Shorter papers are acceptable, but make sure you have thoroughly answered the questions. Submissions that exceed the page limit will be penalized.  You are advised to use your notes, the readings, and lectures to compose your answers. 1. (35 points) External Analysis: Please assemble a Porter’s Five Forces analysis of the industry in which Excel operates. As they operate in multiple business lines, you will need to be concise and precise to cover all the relevant information. 2. (35 points) Internal Analysis: Analyze the internal resources and capabilities of Excel. Name two strengths and two weaknesses and support your arguments for why they are strengths and weaknesses. Do not worry about detailing how to overcome the weaknesses at this point. Make sure you are talking about INTERNAL resources! 3. (30 points) Going Forward: Study Excel’s mission and vision, their business lines, and the answers you have provided above to decide what Excel should do to remain competitive and adapt to their changing environment. a. Some hints: i. Pay attention to what the board wants the CEO (refer to the last section of the case,......

Words: 325 - Pages: 2

Charles Schwab in 2008

...Charles Schwab in 2008 1. Analyze the competitive structure of the brokerage house industry using Porter’s five forces model. What are the principle drivers of profitability in this industry? How have changing regulations, demographics, and technology impacted competition over the last two decades? Five Forces Analysis assumes that there are five important forces that determine competitive power in a business situation. These are: 1) Bargaining Power of Supplier 2) Bargaining Power of Buyers 3) Intensity of existing Rivalry 4) Threat of New Entrants 5) Substitutes 1) Bargaining Power of Supplier In the on-line brokerage firms, we have 3 major categories of suppliers that are * Suppliers for IT infrastructure * Suppliers for the software required to operate these sites and offer functionality to customers * Information services that will offer content to brokerage firm’s website Once the on-line brokerage commits to a company (supplier/s) of the above .these companies that supply this back-end infrastructure can be reasonably certain that the on-line brokerage will commit and remain a customer for some time since future equipment will usually have to be compatible with the existing architecture. The same dependencies can be attributed to the software vendors. Another leading supplier consists of firms that provide financial information to the brokerages such as Aether, Reuters and Associated Press. However, Securities and......

Words: 3270 - Pages: 14

Charles Schwab

...the Talk to Chuck campaign? In the early 2000’s, competition started to intensify in the U.S. financial services industry among firms such as Charles Schwab, Merrill Lynch, Fidelity, Ameritrade and E*Trade. By 2004, Schwab’s net income had declined by 39% and they began to lose their reputation as the “leading-edge discount broker”. Furthermore, Schwab was losing its trademark as the ‘king of online brokers” because of its high equity trading prices in comparison to their competitors. This dip in profitability and market share was noted by company directors, and thought to be the result of the growing disconnect between Schwab and its retail customers. Until 2004, Schwab had 6 different advertising campaign strategies that led to inefficiencies in cost and allocated resources. These advertising campaigns focused on a different product or service that Schwab offered to its investors, but due to the magnitude of this approach, their combined efforts became counterproductive. Chief Marketing Officer Becky Saeger, felt that “future growth and brand revitalization” were necessary to rebuilding the Schwab brand. A major focal point to the campaign was the need to differentiate itself from its competitors through approachability. The advent of the internet was a contributing factor toward the diminishing rapport Schwab had with its clients. This avenue of trade instilled individual investors with a self-assured attitude. In addition, it provided convenient......

Words: 1448 - Pages: 6

Charles Schwab

...Charles Schwab: Growth for the Future Marcus Readus & Brea R. Silva Team D Boston University; MET AD 741 October 14, 2013 Abstract This paper will discuss what direction the leading investment Services firm, Charles Schwab Corporation should take over the next ten years. To answer this question, an analysis of where Schwab and the financial industry are right now. In addition, it will examine what social and technological trends are shaping the way financial industry might be heading in the future. Lastly, it will recommend the direction the Schwab organization should take over the next 10 years. Introduction The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE: SCHW) is a leading provider of financial services, with more than 300 offices and 8.9 million active brokerage accounts, 1.6 million corporate retirement plan participants, 895,000 banking accounts, and $2.11 trillion in client assets as of April 30, 2013 (Krieger, 2013). Through its operating subsidiaries, the company provides a full range of securities brokerage, banking, money management and financial advisory services to individual investors and independent investment advisors. Its broker-dealer subsidiary, Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. (member SIPC, www.sipc.org), and affiliates offer a complete range of investment services and products including an extensive selection of mutual funds; financial planning and investment advice; retirement plan and equity compensation plan services; compliance and trade monitoring......

Words: 2626 - Pages: 11

American Connector Co Case Study

...89 |  14.89 * 0.6 =8.93 | ·          Ø  As Sunnyvale’s defect rates are at 26000 PPM of production which is relatively high. The Quality control of DJC is process centric where each process is QC monitored unlike in Sunnyvale its end product inspection. The quality losses of DJC and ACC over total production are 0.7% and 1.6%. So, Quality is one grey zone which needs to be addressed by ACC. Ø  Work in process inventory cost is very high in case of ACC in comparison to DJC. This in turn is reduces connector output per square foot as extra space is required for WIP and finished goods(15.1 of Kawasaki VS. 10.9 of Sunnyvale). Ø  As Kawasaki plant is working for 24hrs/day thus the asset utilisation is maximum and Connector output per employee is very high. (75.4%  of Kawasaki VS. 30.2% of Sunnyvale) Ø  Due to high number of product variations in customer orders of Sunnyvale which is employing batch production system there is frequent changes in product manufacturing lines thus resulting in lower efficiency which could be obtained in case of standardised products.(Product lines were as small as 1.5 to 2 days) Ø  The raw material inventories of DJC is averaging only 5 days as compared to 10.8 days of ACC. So, DJC is incurring less Inventory cost which again reduces finished good cost.  Ø  The speed of customer order delivery of DJC is one day (because of highly automated production process at Kawasaki plant) whereas the speed of customer order delivery of ACC is more than......

Words: 3021 - Pages: 13

Pepsi Co Case Study

...Pepsi Co With the assumptions given in the case, we estimated the WACC to be 12.23%. The cost of equity represented in the WACC was calculated using the geometric mean return on T-bonds and the long-term government bond rate (4.5%) as the appropriate risk free rate. We chose this over the arithmetic mean return using T-bills under the assumption that the geometric mean is more appropriate to use in estimating the expected return over longer time horizons, especially because as we go towards longer time horizon returns become more serially correlated. The difference in our estimated WACC from the 11% estimated could be attributed to the choice between arithmetic or geometric risk premiums and the short term/long-term risk free rates. (See exhibit 1) Since PepsiCo is comprised of three different business segment, we felt that it was in our best interest to calculate the cost of capital for each of the segments in order to achieve the appropriate WACC. We calculated the new WACCs via pure play method and used comparable companies for references (See Exhibit 2 for divisional segments). In order to use the pure play method, we averaged the betas, debt-equity ratios, and tax rates for all the related companies in each segment. We unlevered the betas and re-levered it to PepsiCo’s specifications. We arrived with the betas of .85, .83, and 1.19 for restaurants, snack foods, and soft drinks respectively. In the end we estimated 12.17%, 13.15%, and 15.74% as our new WACCs for the......

Words: 455 - Pages: 2

Charles Schwab Corporation

...ISM – II Case Analysis I Charles Schwab Corporation (A) Pricing Decision - 1 The following are the three possible price points that Pottruck is faced with: David Pottruck Is not a viable price point as they do not want to indulge in a price war with the low price discount traders The brand “Schwab” would be hurt as they would not be able to provide the service associated with the brand name at this price The range of services commanded at least a $10 price premium to the mid sized firms and a $20 premium on the bare bone providers The revenues impact will be similar to the 29.95 price point They also have an existing product - e.Schwab at a lower price point.They are looking to resolves issues with it and come up with a product with full range of services $19.95 $39.95 $29.95 The price would eventually drop down to this level due to competition Even at this price point, Charles Schwab will have the highest prices in the market At this price point price elasticity is more than that at $39.95 Pricing Decision - 2   Pricing has to be tackled on both the strategic as well as tactical level. Based on the analysis, our recommendation is: ◦ To provide a product with full features at $29.95 price point ◦ This price justifies their added services and will help prevent the other low cost firms from eating away at their market share ◦ Also, Charles Schwab has earned the reputation of entering every segment first. Entering at $29.95 will make it a......

Words: 717 - Pages: 3

Charles Schwab and Co

...ქეისი N4 Charles Schwab – the switchboard business design ამ ქეისში განხილულია ამერიკელი მილიარდელი ბიზნესმენის მიერ დანერგილი ბიზნეს მოდელი და მისი რევოლუციური მოღვაწეობა ამერიკის ფინანსურ ბაზარზე. შეიძლება ვთქვათ, რომ მისმა ბიზნეს მოდელმა განვითარების სამ საფეხურიანი გზა გაიარა: თავიდან ჩამოყალიბდა discount brokerage კომპანიად, შემდგომ იყო financial planner-ებთან თანამშრომლობით მიღებული დიზაინი და საბოლოოდ მიიღო გამანაწილებელი დაფის (switchboard) ბიზნეს მოდელის ფორმა. ამ ბიზნეს მოდელის დანახვასა და განხორციელებაში ჩემი აზრით მნიშვნელოვანი როლი ითამაშა 2-მა ძირითადმა ფაქტორმა, თავად შვაბის პიროვნებამ და ფინანსურ ბაზარზე არსებულმა მდგომარეობამ, რომელმაც ხელი შუეწყო მის განვითარებას. შვაბის პიროვნებამ იმიტომ, რომ ამ ადამაინს ბავშვობიდანვე ჰქონდა მიდრეკილება შემოსავლის მიღების და ფულის კეთების. როგორც ცნობილია ჯერ კიდევ სკოლის პერიოდში თავს ირჩენდა ბაზარში კაკლის (ნიგვზის) გაყიდვით, კარდაკარ კვერცხებითა და ქათმებით ვაჭრობით. რაც შეეხება ფინანსურ ბაზარზე არსებულ სიტუაციას ის შემდეგნაირი იყო: არსებობდა რამდენიმე საბროკერო კომპანია და არსებობდნენ ადამიანები, რომელთაც სურდათ ფულის დაბანდება. საინვესტიციო პორტფელების შესაქმნელად საჭირო იყო ინფორმაციის მოძიება და გაანალიზება, ამისთვის ინვესტორები ქირაობდნენ ბროკერებს, ეს უკანასკნელნი კი აძლევდნენ მათ რჩევებს, რაშიც იღებდნენ თანხას. ერთი შეხედვით ყველაფერი ნორმალურადაა, მაგრამ ბაზარზე არსებობს მხოლოდ ერთი სახის შეთავაზება, რომელსაც აქვს პაკეტის სახე. ამ მომსახურებიდან კლიენტს რეალურად შეიძლება არ სჭირდებოდეს მთელი პაკეტი, მაგრამ......

Words: 1208 - Pages: 5

Charles Schwab Executive Summary

...1975, Charles Schwab created the discount broker. With new rules set in place commissions would now be set by market competition. While competitors like Merrill Lynch and Fidelity raised their fees, Charles Schwab chose the opposite route. For so many years the cost of trading stock was so high it limited the investment opportunities available for Americans. Schwab envisioned that individual investors would jump on the opportunity to be in control of their trading at a discounted rate. By focusing on the principle of providing the best customer experience across all channels CS revolutionized the brokerage industry. With the introduction of online trading in the late 90’s, CS became one of the top financial services firms in the nation while doubling profits. However, a dynamic marketplace posed new challenges. The stock market crash of 2001 and competition from new Internet discount brokers cut into CS’s transaction fees, which was their main source of revenue. With high trading volumes likely coming to an end CS has to focus on other sources of revenue. Recommendations CS’s decision to become the first discount brokerage firm was a great strategy to cement them as a force in the brokerage industry. However, this image was hurting them for future growth. While CS offered many of the same services affluent investors ($1MM + investable assets) sought from full-commissioned brokerage (FCB) firms, they weren’t known for them. As seen in the case study, Charles Schwab......

Words: 687 - Pages: 3

The Vega Food Co. Case Study

...The Vega Food Company Case five gives us a prime example of a family business that was nearly broken due to poor communication between family members. The Valle family and their business, The Vega Food Company, recovered from the down times with strength and unity; however, it was not without the careful leadership of a few key family members. It is clear that without the intervention of Francisco Valle Jr., the company and family may have suffered a much different outcome. Francisco Valle Jr. dedicated himself to fulfilling his father’s legacy. As the only son he slips smoothly in to his father’s footsteps by investing his time in his father’s company; while his other siblings had invested their lives in other areas. However, his sisters felt entitled to benefits from their father’s work. It is clear how they would get this idea, after learning that Francisco Sr. simply gave one of his daughters 650,000 dollars in order to buy a house. How should this seem fair to Francisco Jr., who has put all of his efforts towards helping the business; yet, his sister receives “something for nothing.” Francisco Jr. later balanced this extreme gesture of generosity by adjusting distributions to equalize the other sisters with a gift of comparable value. Although this may seem to be a bad move from a business stand point, I see it as a vital move that brought the family back together and enabled them to put the past behind so that they may work towards future goals. Francisco Valle Sr...

Words: 557 - Pages: 3

Charles Schwab

...CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION Resumen situación actual: David Pottruck es codirector general Charles Schwab es fundador Se espera que en 1997 Schwab tenga ingresos por $2300 M; beneficio neto de $270 M, crecimiento de ingresos 20%, cuentas de clientes 4,8 M, activos de clientes +40%= $354000 M, capitalización doble en el mercado US$ 11000 M. Total de cuentas en línea: 1,2 M que es 25% del total: US$81000 M en activo de clientes. Schwab esta bien situada en el canal en línea, teniendo 5 veces mas cuentas que e*trade. Mayor intermediario con servicios en línea, servicios valiosos, precio justo. La empresa genera el 80% de los ingresos con el 20% de los clientes. Desde el punto de vista técnico se dispone de capacidad para soportar aumento de operaciones previsto Cambio en el sector: El sector de la intermediación financiera se mueve cada vez mas hacia el internet. Es cuestión de tiempo para meterse de lleno. La categoría por internet es muy competida. Mejorar la capacidad de operar por internet para retener clientes de mas volumen, atraer nuevos inversores x precios bajos y servicio de calidad. Los clientes son cada vez mas independientes y quieren tener el control, además están familiarizados con la tecnología. Hay que actuar deprisa lo cual proporciona ventaja competitiva. Asegurar temprana posición en el mercado es una ventaja competitiva. los bancos de inversión de wall street ausentes en el mercado de operaciones por internet por su estructura de costes......

Words: 2407 - Pages: 10

Charles Schwab

... 1. Charles Schwab revolutionized the brokerage industry in 1975 by allowing individual investors to manager their assets and making transactions free from high costs. 2. In 1996, company launched online trading platform and cut the equity trading price to an industry low of 29.95 per trade. It soon became King of online brokers with 2.2million customer base. 3. By late 90’s, deregulation generated intense price competition. Company brand was caught in threats from full service brokerage firms and deep discount Internet brokers. 4. Adding to that there are technology advancements during 90s that enabled customers to invest securities online, while becoming independent of brokers. In response to this company offered broad range of financial services. 5. By 2004, revenues are flat and net income declined by 39% in just 12 months. 6. Company was not providing good value to the clients. The company’s relative price had increased and it is no longer considered as low cost service provider. 7. Due to profitability pressure they trimmed the marketing budget, but they kind of soon realized with their new marketing director that they needed fresh marketing plan to revitalize their brand. 8. So they started TTC campaign in test markets in 2005 Q4. In the end of Q4 when they compared the results with control markets the lift in the test markets are positive. Planning for 2006: Marketing director had a marketing plan that budgeted around 200 million......

Words: 387 - Pages: 2

Case Study of Beta Management Co.

...|September |-4.89 |-13.04 |-1.91 | |October |-0.41 |0 |-12.5 | |November |6.44 |1.5 |17.26 | |December |2.72 |-2.56 |-8.53 | Original handout has Figures 1 and 2 depicting Monthly Returns of California R.E.I.T. vs. S&P 500 Index Fund and Monthly Returns of Brown Group, Inc. vs. S&P 500 IndexFund. I am working on getting these graphs for you, but as yet do not have them. However, I was told that they were not necessary to answer the questions, just there to provide further clarity on the case. If you do need them, please advise and I will definitely get them to you. Thank you....

Words: 1243 - Pages: 5