A Gailure in Generalship

In: Historical Events

Submitted By troykentking
Words 4674
Pages 19
A failure in generalship

For the second time in a generation, the United States faces the prospect of defeat at the hands of an insurgency. In April 1975, the U.S. fled the Republic of Vietnam, abandoning our allies to their fate at the hands of North Vietnamese communists. In 2007, Iraq’s grave and deteriorating condition offers diminishing hope for an American victory and portends risk of an even wider and more destructive regional war.
These debacles are not attributable to individual failures, but rather to a crisis in an entire institution: America’s general officer corps. America’s generals have failed to prepare our armed forces for war and advise civilian authorities on the application of force to achieve the aims of policy. The argument that follows consists of three elements. First, generals have a responsibility to society to provide policymakers with a correct estimate of strategic probabilities. Second, America’s generals in Vietnam and Iraq failed to perform this responsibility. Third, remedying the crisis in American generalship requires the intervention of Congress.
Armies do not fight wars; nations fight wars. War is not a military activity conducted by soldiers, but rather a social activity that involves entire nations. Prussian military theorist Carl von Clausewitz noted that passion, probability and policy each play their role in war. Any understanding of war that ignores one of these elements is fundamentally flawed.
The passion of the people is necessary to endure the sacrifices inherent in war. Regardless of the system of government, the people supply the blood and treasure required to prosecute war. The statesman must stir these passions to a level commensurate with the popular sacrifices required. When the ends of policy are small, the statesman can prosecute a conflict…...

Similar Documents

History: Multiple Questions

...major factors in the victory of the North over the South? In general, there are five reasons why the North emerged victorious over South in the American Civil War (1861-65). First, the North had strong manpower (Union armies). Second, the North had increased production due to industrialization, which supplied armies with sufficient arms and ammunitions (Samir, 2011). Third, the north had adequate finances, mainly, raised from taxes. Also, the North had a strong leadership under the reign of Lincoln, as opposed to Jefferson Davis. Finally, the North had a stronger naval position than the South. Question 12: Compare and contrast the generalship of Robert E. Lee and Ulysses S. Grant. In your opinion who was the more successful commander? Which Civil War general had the greatest impact on future US military strategy? In the generalship both generals; Grant and Lee had a strong believe in exploiting their victory. They did this by tracking the energy hard, and destroying them. Also, both generals made their reputation from the civil war. However, in my opinion Grant was a better commander than Lee. This is because; Lee failed to finish up most of his victory, though he won many. General William Tecumseh Sherman had the most influence on US military strategy. He is regarded as a father of ‘total war.’ He applied strategies such as destroying infrastructure, and stealing the crops and properties of his enemies. Reference Samir. (2011).......

Words: 406 - Pages: 2


...he conventional wisdom concerning the comparative generalship of Robert E. Lee and Ulysses S. Grant was established almost immediately after the War of the Rebellion. Despite his role as, in the words of Frederick Douglass, “the rebel chieftain,” Lee has been portrayed as surpassing all others on both sides of the conflict not only in soldierly virtue but also in magnanimity and humanity. Indeed, for decades, no Civil War figure, not even Abraham Lincoln, has exceeded the reputation of Robert E. Lee. Lee has been described as the perfect soldier—a Christian and a gentleman as well as a peerless commander who led his renowned Army of Northern Virginia to a spectacular series of victories against overwhelming odds. For three years, he and his army provided the backbone of the Confederate cause. But though his adversaries were far less skillful than he, they were able to bring to bear superior resources, which ultimately overwhelmed the Confederacy. In the words of Gary Gallagher, the conventional wisdom held that “In defeat, Lee and his soldiers could look back on a record of selfless regard for duty and magnificent accomplishment.” Grant, on the other hand, has been described as a “butcher.” According to the conventional wisdom, Grant lacked strategic sense and tactical competence and was able to achieve victory only by taking advantage of the manpower and material superiority of the Union to bludgeon his opponent into submission. John Maynard Keynes, discussing the......

Words: 295 - Pages: 2

Khalid Bin Walid

...KHALID BIN WALID INTRODUCTION 1. History could present only a few undefeated Gen of the world. Probably, Khalid Bin Walid is the best amongst them, fought battles after battles being winner. As the first muslim general, Khalid conquered Iraq and greater part of Syria thereby shook the foundations of the proud Roman and Persian empires. These played a great Role in propagation of the cause of islam. In recognition of his skill generalship in defence of the ideology of Islam. Prophet Muhammed (SM) coveted him with the rare title SAIFULLAH (THE SWORD OF ALLAH). 2. Against highly organized standing Armies, Khalid fought with the Arabian Tribes. His leadership did not only compensate own numenrical and material insufficiency but inspired man under his command to perform military actions with unimaginable courage and determination. Regarding his professional ability and skill, I quote Arab historian PK Hitti, “The military campaigns of Khalid bin Walid which ensured (after Muhammads death) in Iraq, Persia, Syria and Egypt are among the most brilliantly executed ones in the history of warfare and bear favourable comparison with those of Napoleon, Hanibal or Alexander.” AIM 3. The aim of this presentation is to analyse the style, actions and personal qualities of Khalid Bin Walid as a military leader. SCOPE 4. I with my group would like to present the analysis on Khalid Bin Walid as per the following sequence: a. Preliminary career. b. ...

Words: 10410 - Pages: 42

Yingling Academic Argument

...LTC(R) Yingling’s article, “A Failure in Generalship” argues that America’s generals failed to prepare our armed forces for war and advise civilian authorities on the application of force to achieve the aims of policy. The argument he presented in this article is weak, and I will argue this under two premises. First, LTC(R) Yingling utilized fallacies throughout his argument to support claims of generalship failures. Second, he excludes the other points of possible failure to focus on one set of rank within the officer corps. LTC(R) Yingling’s utilization of fallacies throughout his argument serves to create confusion, bias, and diversions for the reader of this article. He distracts the audience by the introduction of a red herring in his argument. The summation of his first two paragraphs discuss war as “a social activity that involves entire nations,” and “passion of the people is necessary to endure the sacrifices inherent in war.” These ideas raise a side issue separate from the focus of the first element of discussion, responsibilities of generalship. LTC(R) Yingling exhibits circular reasoning when he states, “the general must visualize the conditions of future combat,” and goes on to state, “not even the most skilled general can visualize precisely how future wars will be fought.” If a general’s responsibility is to visualize what he is unable to visualize, this begs the question of how much culpability a general is truly responsible for, assuming the......

Words: 659 - Pages: 3

Argumentive Essay

...should not waste their time on studying old information. With the fast changing combat environment, tactics, techniques, and procedures are continually changing. The means in which the Army fought in the civil war cannot be applied today so military professionals should not take time out to study history. Military Professionals should concentrate more on the current TTPs in order to save Soldiers lives. NCOs will receive proper training through professional development at Noncommissioned Officer Education System (NCOES) courses throughout their career to keep them efficient. Conclusion These were just some of the examples from our history. Through the continuance of studying military history we can learn lessons in fighting, lessons in generalship, lessons in innovation, and the lessons of lessons learned. “Only the study of history is capable of giving those who have no experience of their own a clear picture of what I have just called the friction of the whole machine” Clausewitz (1812). As professional soldiers we should study military history to expand our knowledge from what previous military leaders have conducted during past conflicts and experiences. When we study these events we enhance our awareness and decisive thinking from studying military history. This will make us better leader by providing us with a base of knowledge to manage the battle of tomorrow thought the lessons learned from the past. References Stewart, R. W. (2005). American Military History......

Words: 1494 - Pages: 6

Alexander the Great: the Quest to Be Greater

...his father’s. Alexander was able to conquer and declare himself king of Persia, something his father was not able to accomplish. Alexander conquered for eleven years before falling short to his death. Alexander the Great left behind one of the greatest empires ever built, one he believed to be superior to the one his father, Phillip II, left behind. The spark and fuel to become a conqueror of land beyond the walls of Macedonia, was kindled by the resentment he built up for his father over a life time. Bibliography: • Plutrach Lives: The Life of Alexander. III. London: GEORGE BELL & SONS, YORK ST., COVENT GARDEN, AND NEW YORK., 1892. 300-379. eBook. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/14140/14140-h/14140-h.htm • Fuller, J. F. C. The Generalship of Alexander the Great. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1960. Print. • Carney, E. , and D. Ogden. Philip ii and alexander the great: Father and son lives and afterlives. Oxford University Press, print. • Austin, M. M. The Hellenistic World from Alexander to the Roman Conquest: A Selection of Ancient Sources in Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006. Print....

Words: 1224 - Pages: 5

Hoplite Book Review

...essays. Both sought out to bring the reader to the experience of battle and indulge a different perspective on how hoplite warfare is studied and analyzed. A key difference exists in the writers of the two pieces. Although both share the urge to feel the battle, Hanson was the only one to which opportunity would present itself to place him in the most similar situation as possible to the hoplites. Hanson’s collection should serve as more desirable education tool due to his military experience. While surely well written, Keegan’s lack of military service sheds more credibility towards Hanson. Hanson himself makes not of this very subtlety by referencing “what Eudamidas, the son of Archidamos, said when he heard a philosopher speaking about generalship: ‘The speech is admirable, but the speaker is untrustworthy, for he has never heard the salpinx’” (Hanson 119(Plutarch. Mor. 220E)). In addition to Hoplites: The Classical Greek Battle Experience, Hanson has authored many books on ancient Greece and their warfare. One in particular has sharp similarities to the title being reviewed. Published in 2009, The Western Way of War: Infantry Battle in Classical Greece, makes a point that not only did the Greeks invent the central ideas of western politics, but that they are responsible for the way the west conducts war in the decisive infantry battle. The book states that they devised a ferocious and destructive way to conduct war. He aims to link this then, new style of fighting, to......

Words: 1450 - Pages: 6


...of the US. Samsung as a small export business which has grown to become one of the worlds are leading electronics companies, specializing in digital appliances and media, semiconductors, memory, and system integration. Today Samsung's innovative and top quality products and processes are world recognized. 2. Sun Zi’s Art of War Theory These five factors are moral influence, the weather, terrain, generalship, and doctrine and law. Moral influence refers to measures and policies that align the people with the sovereign so as to be in complete agreement and harmony with each other.In this way, the people will be prepared to co-exist with as well as die for the sovereign without any fear of dangers. Weather refers to the contrasting changes of night and day, the coldness of winter and the heat of summer, and seasonal changes. Terrain refers to whether the route to be taken is long or short, whether the ground is treacherous or safe, wide or narrow with regard to ease of movement, and whether the ground will determine the death or survival (of an army). The generalship of a commander refers to his qualities of wisdom, trustworthiness, benevolence, courage and discipline. Doctrine and law refer to organization and control, management systems and procedures, and the command and control structure for the deployment of resources. Every general must know these five factors. Those who can master them will win. Those who do not understand them will not win. 3. SWOT......

Words: 1608 - Pages: 7

Corporate Strategy

...thinking? The term ‘strategic’ has become a much over-used word in business today. You may have observed that the term is increasingly attached to people’s job titles and is used to dignify roles and elevate the status of projects that might otherwise not be regarded as sufficiently important. The dilution of the term strategic is unfortunate because one of the key functions of general managers in all organisations is to engage in strategic thinking. Strategy has a long heritage. The word ‘strategy’ comes from the Greek word for generalship. This betrays the origins of strategy, which lie in the military. Indeed, long before companies were said to have strategies, strategy was a well-developed art within the military sphere. The first writer on strategy is generally held to be the Chinese philosopher, Sun Tzu, whose most popular work, The Art of War, is widely read to this day (Sun Tzu, 2005). In Sun Tzu’s view, the art of generalship was about outmanoeuvring your opponent, convincing them that you were strong in places where you were weak and, conversely, that you were weak in places where you were strong. It was about luring the opposition into a position of weakness before battle was engaged, so that even if you possessed weaker forces, you could overcome the enemy through guile and cunning. Military writers often make a distinction between strategic decisions and tactical decision-making. Activity 1.1 Strategic and tactical decisions Pause......

Words: 6213 - Pages: 25

Dwight D. Eisenhower

...He also successfully managed the at times difficult personalities of his commanders. His decisions to go ahead with D-Day and using the Battle of the Bulge as an opportunity showcased the Generals strategic expertise. A natural leader, Eisenhower was able to boast the moral of his troops. He would often spend time on the front lines getting to know soldiers to inspire confidence and show that he cared for his men (Chen). He was one of if not the most successful general of the war. The biggest decisions he was forced to make all turned out to be the right ones. Eisenhower will forever be remembered for his service to his country and the world during its darkest hour. Works Cited Ambrose, Stephen E. "Eisenhower’s Generalship." Eisenhower’s Generalship (n.d.): n. pag. 1999. Web. "American Experience: TV's Most-watched History Series." PBS. PBS, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2015. Balkoski, Joseph. "The Liberation Trilogy by Rick Atkinson." The Liberation Trilogy by Rick Atkinson EXECUTE OPERATION OVERLORD Comments. N.p., June 2014. Web. 14 Apr. 2015. Balkoski, Joseph. "The Liberation Trilogy by Rick Atkinson." The Liberation Trilogy by Rick Atkinson WHO WILL COMMAND THIS OPERATION Comments. N.p., 20 Jan. 2014. Web. 14 Apr. 2015.. Chen, Peter. "Dwight Eisenhower." WW2DB RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2015. Colley, Rupert. "D-day and Omaha Beach - a Brief Summary - History in an Hour." History in an Hour. N.p., 05 June 2014. Web. 14 Apr. 2015. "D-Day, the Battle of Normandy."......

Words: 2931 - Pages: 12

Civil War

...the War? The main reason was that the North had a 10 to 1 advantage in industrial workers. As general Sherman said to a southern colleague, "We can make a locomotive while you are hard pressed to turn out a pair of shoes." This disparity led to a 40 to 1 advantage in naval strength. Water power allowed the Union to build "Scott's Anaconda", a naval blockade which prevented the South from trading with the rest of the world (trading cotton for guns, for example). The trade embargo was devastating to the South's economy, and their soldiers were often equipped with inferior weapons, not enough food, and ragged and barefoot. It is astonishing that the war lasted as long as it did. The South's only advantage was the superiority of their generalship, and the fighting spirit of the private soldiers, but the best generals and the best soldiers could not win against the overwhelming material superiority of the North. Also, in each battle, the South lost the bravest men (and sometimes the best generals). The South could not afford their losses, but the North had a seemingly endless supply of reinforcements. One other disparity of the embargo was that the North could get soldiers from all over the world; many Germans and Irish came over to fight for the North. If McClellan had pressed a little harder in the Peninsula, the war could have been over in 1862, but he was such a jerk (to his superiors) that he had lost the confidence of Lincoln and his cabinet....

Words: 370 - Pages: 2


...Strategy defined What is strategy? The Oxford Dictionary describe strategy as A plan of action designed to achieve a long-term goal or overall aim; or the art of planning and directing overall military operations and movements in a war or battle; It is derived from the Greek word “stratégia” that means generalship (Oxford dictionary. 2015). A company’s strategy consist of the competitive moves and business approaches that managers are employing to grow the business, attract and please customers, compete successfully , conduct operations and achieve the targeted levels of organizational performance (Hough et al. 2008:4). Strategy is all about how the anticipated goals will be achieved. It works like a recipe where different elements are used in a more or lesser manner to achieve an end result. In an organisation the leader ensures all members are heading in the right direction and completing their goals and objectives. Organisations lacking leadership quickly implode as members scatter in all directions attempting to achieve conflicting goals in a silo-orientated environment. However, this can be overcome if leaders communicate and execute business strategies. A business strategy is a leadership plan that achieves a specific set of goals or objectives such as: * Developing new products or services. * Entering new markets. * Increasing customer loyalty. * Attracting new customers. * Increasing sales. * Decreasing costs. (Baltzan, 2013:16) Leaders......

Words: 1682 - Pages: 7


...prospect of plunder if there was a victory was a lucrative incentive for the soldiers. Napoleon also created a sense of esprit de corps through “rewarding success and bravery and punishing failure and weakness.” For example, the award of the Legion of Honour and titles and swords all helped strengthen the French army. Napoleon created a deep “personal loyalty” in the army and his presence on the eve of a battle further rooted this sense of loyalty. His personal impact on army morale partly was the reason why the Duke of Wellington stated that his presence alone was worth 40,000 men. By successfully raising morale, Napoleon was improving the chances of victory since his men trusted him and were willing to take risks, thus showing his good generalship in getting his army fully on his side. On balance, Rothenberg and Esdaile both have valid points and are not exaggerating this strength of Napoleon. Rothenberg and Black both mention that one of the criticisms Napoleon has faced as military leader is that he relied heavily on his subordinates and communication with them at times was very poor. Black claims that Napoleon depended on “primitive communication of the period” such as messengers. All military leaders, however, faced this problem, at the time. This problem in communication is also mentioned in Passage B since “communication on the battlefield..remained haphazard.” If Napoleon could not successfully communicate with parts of his army, then he was in a......

Words: 1292 - Pages: 6

George Washington and the Art of War

...George Washington, Sun Tzu’s Apprentice The American defeat of the British during the Revolutionary War was a direct result of George Washington’s incredible leadership and generalship which showed the greatness of Sun Tzu’s “Art of War”. The key to the success of the American Revolution was the George Washington himself. Faced with an almost impossible task of defeating a powerful enemy, Washington was required to defy the odds. So how does Washington’s accomplishment of this task relate to Sun Tzu and his teachings of “The Art of War”? There crucial points come to light: Washington’s selection as to command the Continental Army and inherent command capabilities, Washington’s strategy for winning the war against the Empire of Great Britain, and the art of maneuver that eventually lead to the critical defeat of Cornwallis and the British at Yorktown. George Washington was the greatest leader to choose for the revolutionary war. Sun Tzu said a leader needs to have wisdom, sincerity, humanity, courage, and strictness. These five crucial traits are shown in Washington’s strategy to win the War of independence. Washington was the embodiment of everything fine in the American character. In caring for his troops and their families he would spend his own money to help them. Washington brought more than just military ability and statesmanship to the Revolution he brought character. General Washington was respected not just by the rank and file, but also by people in all parts......

Words: 890 - Pages: 4


...businessperson today. Therefore, it is important to understand the exact meaning and implication of the work, in order to be familiar with the circumstances prevailing at the time. The topic we had chosen is Chapter 1-Detailed Assessment and Planning. In general, this chapter is thorough analysis before war and war is about deception. Sun Zi said: “The conduct of war is a matter of vital important to the nation.” This will determine the survival or death of the country. In other words, there is matter of life and death for the people and their ruler. Therefore it must be studied and examined the five factors and seven dimensions carefully thorough analyses before war. These five factors are moral influence, weather, terrain, corporate generalship, doctrine and law. On the other hand, the seven dimensions are: * Thus, which ruler has greater moral influence? * Which general is more able and has greater abilities and skills? * Which side (army) is able to better exploit the weather and terrain? * Which side (army) is able to execute and implement law and order more effectively? * Which side (army) has more and stronger troops? * Which side (army) has better trained officers and men? * Which side (army) is more enlightened in the administration of rewards and punishments? Thus in planning, the five factors and seven dimensions must analyze and compare with those of the enemy so that general can understand the changing......

Words: 2258 - Pages: 10