A Fear of Democracy Runs Through Liberalism

In: Other Topics

Submitted By AndyStorm123
Words 700
Pages 3
How far do you agree that the character of Charles 1 is most important in understanding the King’s decision to rule without parliament in 1629?
By Andy Todd
Charles 1 was a stubborn, austere and arrogant king. He was also shy, young and inexperienced when he took to the throne in 1925 at the age of just 24. He suffered from a stutter which is seen as one of the main reasons why he was known as a poor communicator. Tying in with his supposedly weak character was something which made him even more arrogant and stubborn. This was his belief in Divine Right; a theory that was drilled in to him by his father King James 1 which meant that the God had blessed him so he could be a completely autocratic ruler. However, it’s not possible to believe that it was purely Charles’s personality which led to him resorting to personal rule on March 2, 1629.
Charles 1 was a very loyal person who was known to become very attached and very trusting of one or two particular people. This lead to him making the despised Duke of Buckingham is closest advisor, as the Duke had been very close to Charles’s father, Charles trusted him completely. However, the Duke led Charles into a disastrous foreign policy. In 1628, Sir Edward Coke stated that the Duke of Buckingham was ‘the cause of all our miseries’, ‘the cause of all evils the kingdom suffered, and an enemy to the public’. The Duke, in 1625, had led the Cadiz expedition to attack Spain. The army landed on the coast, got drunk, and had to be evacuated. On the way home many of the ships ran out of food and water, and many soldiers died. And in 1627 Buckingham encouraged Charles to declare war on France, while the war with Spain was still going on. Buckingham then led the lle de Ré expedition to relieve the Protestants of La Rochelle; however he was forced to retreat after heavy losses. So as you can see, Buckingham seemed to just lead…...

Similar Documents

Realism and Liberalism

...Realism and Liberalism Political realism believes that politics, like society in general, is governed by objective laws that have their roots in human nature. In order to improve society it is first necessary to understand the laws by which society lives, the operation of these laws being impervious to our preferences. Realism, believing as it does in the objectivity of the laws of politics, must also believe in the possibility of developing a rational theory that reflects, however imperfectly and one-sidedly, these objective laws. It believes also in the possibility of distinguishing in politics between truth and opinion – between what is true objectively and rationally, supported by evidence and illuminated by reason, and what is only a subjective judgment. Realism is a theory within international relations which predicts states will act in their own national interest in defiance of moral consideration. In general, this belief results from an observation of human nature and the perception of people as selfish and fiercely competitive. Realism regards the international arena as anarchic, governed by no authority overriding sovereign states. International institutions such as the United Nations are not afforded significant credibility from a realist perspective. Rather, influence is perceived to be held predominately by major powers such as the United States, whose dominance is a product of military and economic strength. Realists hold the primary......

Words: 2876 - Pages: 12

Has Liberalism Betrayed Its Classical Principles?

...Has liberalism betrayed its classical principles? Liberalism is a powerful modern thrust which is not just an ideology, but has become more of a western understanding. Liberalism emerged during the 19th century, following the French revolution i.e. the feudal period. The philosophy had set out principles in relation to the individual such as freedom, reason, justice, toleration and liberal democracy. A century later, there was the establishment of modern liberals. Modern liberalist ideas are similar to those of the classical liberals but, in some cases differ quite vigorously. It has been argued that modern liberals have betrayed the core, classical principles of liberalism. Classical liberals believe that the individual is largely self seeking and self reliant. These liberals believe in an atomistic society, which is the idea that society itself doesn’t exist and that individuals are out to satisfy their own personal needs. C.B. Macpherson described early liberalism as ‘possessive individualism’ where one owes nothing to society. Modern liberals on the other hand have a more optimistic view of human nature. They state that an individual must have social responsibility for one another, especially those who are unable to care for themselves. Modern liberals trust that there should be a unity amongst individuals to create an effective society where one is able to flourish to the fullness of their potential. They are in favour of social support rather than the classical......

Words: 968 - Pages: 4

Democracy and Communism

...Democracy and Communism Looking at democracy through both its weaknesses and strengths in comparison with other forms of government makes it evident that it is the best form of political system we have. In a democracy, the government is the spokesperson for their people and the needs they would like to be met. The government is a group of people in the state who have an authority to act on behalf of that state. A democracy is a state in which citizens vote to choose the best candidate to be the leader of the country. Democracy appeared from liberalism, which is the ideology when individuals develop their capacities to the fullest. A democracy reflects the liberal value that individuals are responsible for their own choices. Citizens can be free to run their lives as they want. Democracy requires an attitude of mind, a belief that every citizen has the right to outspeak and hear what is going on. However, one of the challenges of a democratic electoral system is even if we have the right to express our views, we would not take advantage of it because of its unpredictable consequences. Despite all the democratic weaknesses of this ideology, democracy is still highly consistent and about unpredictable outcomes. What makes democracy highly consistent is not knowing what the next election turnout will be, but having confidence that the candidate with a majority of votes would be elected. The essential goal of democracy is to provide a fair degree of uncertainty. What......

Words: 271 - Pages: 2

Democracy

...Democracy Expansion In a democracy, the government is the spokesperson for the people and the needs they would like to be met. The government is a group of people in the state who have the ultimate authority to act on behalf of that state. A democracy is a state in which citizens vote to choose the best candidate. Democracy derived from liberalism, which is the ideology that individuals develop their capacities to the fullest. A democracy reflects the liberal value that individuals are responsible for their own choices. Citizens can be free to run their lives as they want. Democracy requires an attitude of mind, a belief that every citizen has the right to a hearing, a sense that no doors are closed to talent and energy. Democracy in Africa is slowly coming together, but not fast enough. 1993 was the first presidential in 10 years. Abiola won, but soon went to jail for treason and the military remains in power. The wave of democratization called “second liberation” began at the end of the cold war. Political institutions have to be built in order for Africa to become a full fledge democracy. "Most of Africa lacks the crucial educated middle class and professional classes and the mediating private and public institutions that compose a civil society”(William Pfaff). Political conflicts have brought a collapse of government of authority. The low levels of income at about $300 per year continent wide and huge trade deficits is not a good standing in moving...

Words: 1053 - Pages: 5

A River Runs Through It

...A River Runs Through It Water Comprises almost 75% of earth's surface and is undoubtedly our most precious natural resource. No living organism could exist on our planet without water. In direct contrast to water that promotes life is pollution which endangers it. Pollution is defined by the Environment Protection Act of 2001 (Chap 435 of the Laws of Malta) as "the direct or indirect introduction by man into the environment of substances, organisms, genetic material or energy that cause or are likely to cause hazard to human health, harm to living resources or to ecosystems, or damage to amenities, or interfere with other legitimate uses of the environment". Pollutants such as sewage and fertilizers contain nutrients such as nitrates and phosphates. At high levels, nutrients can over stimulate the growth of aquatic plants and algae. Excessive growth of these types of organisms consequently impairs the flow of the waterways, deters the amount of oxygen in the water since the pollutants use up oxygen as they decompose, and block light to deeper waters. This impairs the growth of necessary aquatic organisms as it affects the respiration ability of fish and other creatures of the sea. Pollution is also caused when silt and other suspended solids, such as soil, wash off plowed fields, construction and logging sites, urban areas, and eroded river banks directly into streams and rivers when it rains. The pollution can enter......

Words: 1072 - Pages: 5

Liberalism in French Revolution Through Enlightenment

...THE LIBERAL REVOLUTION -UNDER THE IDEA OF ENLIGHTENMENT "Dare to know! Have courage to use your own reason!"-Kant Contents ENLIGHTENMENT AS AN IDEA: 3 FRENCH SOCIETY: 3 THE LIBERAL REVOLUTION: 3 CRITICISM ON THE IDEA OF LIBERALISM: 4 CONCLUSION 5 BIBLIOGRAPHY 6 ENLIGHTENMENT AS AN IDEA: “Enlightenment is man's emergence from his self-imposed nonage… Sapere Aude! Dare to Know! Have the courage to use your own understanding is therefore the motto of the Enlightenment.” Immanuel Kant (Columbia.edu) The eighteenth century Enlightenment proved to be a movement of the intellectuals who dared to prove all the aspects in life scientifically. These individuals were greatly affected by the scientific revolution. They were, in addition, advocating the appliance of the scientific methodology to the understanding of life. Throughout the age of enlightenment, science became popular and there were many philosophers like John Locke, Jean Jacques Rousseau, Adam Smith, Montesquieu, etc who applied the natural laws to the social life. These people and their writings had a huge impact on the French Revolution. FRENCH SOCIETY: Prior to the revolution, the French society was buried under the burden of taxes-levied by the State, rents paid to the lord, contributions collected by the clergy, as well as under the forced labor exacted by all three. People were reduced to foraging for food because of the recurring famines. The famines were caused by both......

Words: 1593 - Pages: 7

Liberalism

...promotion of constitutional reform. Discuss. (30) Individual rights are at both the centre of liberal philosophy and liberal party politics. From the days of classical liberalism, Locke discussed natural rights. The libertarian strand of liberalism with Nozick focuses on entitlement rights. The modern day Liberal Democrats state ‘the protection of civil liberties are at the heart of our purpose and philosophy’. Human rights help individuals gain freedom and liberty thus liberals must protect them. Also constitutional reform has been long connected to liberalism due to liberals fear of state power and want for individual freedom. Moreover, constitutional reform places balances and checks on government. The lib-dems have kept their loyalty to a more representative voting system within the coalition, shown through their instigation of the AV referendum in 2011. Human rights are rights that everyone is entitled to despite citizenship, for example freedom of speech. Lockes natural rights embodies human rights. Bentham dismissed natural rights as ‘nonsense on stilts’ stating that rights were but the child of law. The Lib-Dems support for Labours Human Rights Act shows protection of human rights/naturals rights but creating legislation. Modern liberals place rights to groups, not only individuals as the classical liberals promote, such as homosexuals in order to achieve equality of opportunity. The Liberals democrat party in the UK has shown its close association with the......

Words: 376 - Pages: 2

A Fear of Democracy Runs Through Conservatism

...Tom Chapman A2 Political Theory DATE \@ "d MMMM y" 20 September 2015 A Fear of Democracy Runs Through Liberalism A2 Political Theory A fear of Democracy runs through Liberalism. Do Liberal individuals fear the hand of the state and the will of the people? Are Liberals fearful of what the ruling majority may impose on them or are they perfectly happy bending the knee to the authority of the state and the decisions of the masses, if only to preserve their own civil liberties and rights? To assess if this is the case or not we must first understand a rather complicated question; what is Liberalism? Liberalism can be traced back to the decline of Feudalism in the 18th Century and the revolutions of both France (1789) and the USA (1765) where we saw two states try to shake off the ruling class and enter a new era of enlightenment where there was, generally, consensus ruling. Liberalism then comes to the fore front of Political thinking around the period of the Industrial Revolution in Britain and Europe in the 19th Century which led to many people rising through the ranks and creating a form of social mobility linked with Liberal ideas of self rule and governance. It’s this Industrial Revolution period where we see Liberalism take it’s first form - what we now call classical Liberalism. Classical Liberals believe in the idea of negative freedoms where by each person is able to both thrive and fail in society, this goes hand in hand with the idea of maintaining state......

Words: 1270 - Pages: 6

Liberalism

...Part of a series on Liberalism Development[show] Ideas[show] Variants[show] People[show] Organizations[show] • Liberalism portal • Politics portal • v • t • e • 1. • • • • • • • • • • Words such as liberal, liberty, libertarian, and libertine all trace their history to the Latin liber, which means "free". One of the first recorded instances of the word liberal occurs in 1375, when it was used to describe the liberal arts in the context of an education desirable for a free-born man.[13] The word's early connection with the classical education of a medieval university soon gave way to a proliferation of different denotations and connotations. Liberal could refer to "free in bestowing" as early as 1387, "made without stint" in 1433, "freely permitted" in 1530, and "free from restraint"—often as a pejorative remark—in the 16th and the 17th centuries.In 16th century England, liberal could have positive or negative attributes in referring to someone's generosity or indiscretion.[13] In Much Ado About Nothing, Shakespeare wrote of "a liberal villaine" who "hath...confest his vile encounters".[13] With the rise of the Enlightenment, the word acquired decisively more positive undertones, being defined as "free from narrow prejudice" in 1781 and "free from bigotry" in 1823.[13] In 1815, the first use of the word liberalism appeared in English.[14] In Spain, the Liberales, the first group to use the liberal label in a......

Words: 2991 - Pages: 12

Liberalism for Development

...Liberalism for World Development Hubert H. Humprey stated that liberalism, above all, means emancipation - emancipation from one's fears, his inadequacies, from prejudice, from discrimination, from poverty. That could not be further from the truth in the world of economy. Collaboration and agreements among countries are very important in today’s world development. Economies that have remained closed from the rest of the world have not been able to attain and sustain growth. Many developing countries have gained competitive advantages and growth by implementing open market and trade liberalization. Only through liberalism can economic potential be unleashed. Trace back to origin of liberalism, the Italian merchants wanted more freedom and rights and encouraged free trade in order to move towards a more liberal, innovative system. We will show you that free trade and innovation are the only viable and compatible models for development. We will also show that inevitably the world is moving towards embracing the liberal model. South Korea and Chile are two countries that transformed their economies from the poorest to the one of the best performers. They were both politically ruled under authoritarian regime but later on they all adopted liberal economy. In South Korea, post economic reform, their economy went to another level. GDP hits $1 trillion in 2007. South Korea is one of the fastest growing economies in the world, a huge contrast to its northern......

Words: 910 - Pages: 4

Liberalism Debate

...Vincent Serrecchia Professor Cruz Latino Politics 28 February 2012 Debate Paper #2 According to Webster’s dictionary, the definition of liberalism is as follows, “a political philosophy based on belief in progress, the essential goodness of the human race, and the autonomy of the individual and standing for the protection of political and civil liberties.” The first known use of liberalism in our society was in 1819, and from then on it has always claimed to stand for the greatest social good. As for liberalism being incompatible with identity politics, I disagree. I believe identity politics is compatible with liberalism. Liberalism is considered democracy free while identity politics focus on the self-interest and perspectives of self-identified groups. My first experience with a Latino politics debate wasn’t exactly positive because it made me nervous knowing I had to express my views towards the question that was assigned to our debate. At the beginning of the debate I was a little nervous to speak my opinion because I felt that I did not know enough about the Latino culture, as well as having a hard time understanding the readings. I was afraid that what I was about to say could come off as offending to some of my fellow classmates and, in defense to that, it would cause another debate. However, after having the opportunity to listen to the first debater give their opinion on the question, I felt more comfortable to speak my opinion without the risk of...

Words: 827 - Pages: 4

Democracy

...Democracy index 2010 Democracy in retreat A report from the Economist Intelligence Unit www.eiu.com Democracy index 2010 Democracy in retreat The Economist Intelligence Unit’s Index of Democracy 2010 Democracy in retreat This is the third edition of the Economist Intelligence Unit’s democracy index. It reflects the situation as of November 2010. The first edition, published in The Economist’s The World in 2007, measured the state of democracy in September 2006 and the second edition covered the situation towards the end of 2008. The index provides a snapshot of the state of democracy worldwide for 165 independent states and two territories—this covers almost the entire population of the world and the vast majority of the world’s independent states (micro states are excluded). The Economist Intelligence Unit’s Index of Democracy is based on five categories: electoral process and pluralism; civil liberties; the functioning of government; political participation; and political culture. Countries are placed within one of four types of regimes: full democracies; flawed democracies; hybrid regimes; and authoritarian regimes. Free and fair elections and civil liberties are necessary conditions for democracy, but they are unlikely to be sufficient for a full and consolidated democracy if unaccompanied by transparent and at least minimally efficient government, sufficient political participation and a supportive democratic political culture. It is not easy......

Words: 17951 - Pages: 72

‘a Fear of Democracy Runs Throughout Liberalism.’ Discuss.

...‘A fear of democracy runs throughout liberalism.’ Discuss. Democracy means rule by the people, implying both popular participation and government in the public interest. Liberals have been ambivalent about the benefits of democracy. Very few liberals reject democracy, on the other hand no liberals accept democracy uncritically. Liberals do not believe that a balanced and tolerant society will develop naturally out of the free actions of individuals and voluntary associations. They fear the free individual may exploit others. Therefore; liberals believed that such protection can only be provided by a sovereign state, capable of restraining all individuals and groups within society, freedom can therefore only exist ‘under the law’. Hobbes and Locke both recognised the argument for a social contract agreement between individuals through which they form a state in order to escape ‘state of nature’ without this contract life would be ‘nasty, brutish and short’. Hobbes and Locke developed people coming together in a free compact/agreement to set up power over them a real contract constantly confirmed. Locke through a more continuous process people to express their opinion more regularly through elections, referendums and public opinion. All individuals would recognize that it is in their best interests to sacrifice a portion of their liberty in order to set up a system of law; otherwise their rights and indeed their lives would constantly be under threat. The state is created...

Words: 651 - Pages: 3

A River Runs Through It

...A River Runs Through It, A Perfect Storm, Urban Legend and Party of Five Authors and writers of novels and screenplays are often faced with a very difficult task. They must produce a work which will capture a person’s attention and hold it throughout the work. Norman Maclean and Paul Junger do this in their novels A River Runs Through It and A Perfect Storm, respectively. As do the writers and producers of Urban Legend and Party of Five. There are countless ways to keep a person’s interest. But there are two that are prevalent in these four works. These writers use dramatic irony, constant action, and a hint of mystery to captivate a reader or viewers attention. The thriller Urban Legend is the story of a murderer on a college campus who kills people using various methods in accordance with urban myths. For example, one "urban legend" is a gang initiation ritual. It is said that a gang member will drive without their lights on until somebody flashes them. The person who flashes their lights must now be killed in order to gain acceptance into the gang. While this is not necessarily true, it is a story that many have heard, and the movie is based upon these tales similar to these. Urban Legend is action packed and filled with mystery (never letting on as to who the killer is until the final seconds). By keeping this high level drama throughout the movie, the producers have in effect, kept a viewers attention and let them focus more deeply on the story. Junger’s A......

Words: 783 - Pages: 4

Classrom as a Democracy

...CLASSROOM AS A DEMOCRACY All make laws -- legislative function of govt All enforce/implement laws – executive function of govt All judge/interpret laws – judicial function of govt What will be taught, who will teach it, how students will be graded, what are rules of classroom behavior, when you have to leave, when you have to be stopped in particular behaviors, how we will support our teaching ideas, etc. In direct democracy all are legislators, executives, judges – find rules like unanimity, super-majority, majority, etc. In representative democracy, some are chosen (usually by election or rotation among all members) to make laws, enforce laws, and judge laws. Can separate legis, exec, and jud pwr into different persons to protect of too much power in a few persons hands – SEPARATION OF POWERS Can divide powers so that all agree on some rules, but separate groups can make own rules on others – DIVISION OF POWER [FEDERALISM or SHARED SOVEREIGNTY] In Germany, nobles gained more and more power until the emperor was only figurehead by 13th C. Princes and leading churchmen ran ministates as wanted – Germany was crazy quilt of hundreds of independent principalities and cities. Split b/t Catholics and Protestants made this fragmentation more severe. The Habsburg Emperor, Charles V in the middle of the 16th C almost crushed Lutheranism. Solved problem of different religions by cuius regio eius religion – whoever reigns, his religion. Then the 30 years war......

Words: 1801 - Pages: 8